The best proof of God's existence is by quantum physics

Who I am

How bad are Christians at arguing for God's existence

• what seems to be the most official Christian reference on the topic. Visibly, despite all the usual faith in the existence of Christian scientists (that strong rumor so spread throughout the Christian world), they still did not care or manage to find a good Christian physicist to write a good first-hand expert review on the topic : the author of this page only has a superficial understanding on the topic (well ok, "Master’s degree in Physics from Texas A&M University where he studied Supersymmetry & Cosmology" but his understanding of the debate on quantum interpretations is still visibly quite approximative). And this has some effects : he only looked at the fact that New Age authors claim QM to be in their own pockets when looked at by the Copenhagen interpretation and the one by the fundamental role of consciousness, just like any preacher of any religion will similarly pretend that science supports their specific ideology (no matter if it really does or not). This frightened him, so he cared to not support this interpretation over others (as, one may wonder: which Christians would expect an argument against materialism to not be automatically rigidly specific on which exact religious doctrine may be claimed to be supported by some esoteric science point, in the mouths of propagandists just trying to present anything they can as supporting their own doctrine in the face of a large ignorant public who will never care to actually learn theoretical physics to check the correctness of the argument anyway ? Well ok, some do). Then he vaguely invited to generally look for support to his own theology just as much from every other interpretation, no matter that these are actually naturalistic interpretations (artificially hold as relatively plausible by their followers despite their troubles for the precise motivation of their naturalism). How funny.
• A Theological Argument for an Everett Multiverse, by Don Page, high-level physicist who is Evangelical Christian, thus dismissing the only interpretation of quantum physics with metaphysical significance towards God's existence, in favor of one rather devoid of it. He also expressed skepticism about the possibility of proving God's existence.
• A reference (not so special).
• a crackpot one also found among high ranked google results, which notes that "the question of the conceptual implications of Quantum Mechanics has never been given serious treatment in a biblical context".
• A book commented here seems to just have missed the whole issue.
• "Quantum Common Sense" in the site of American Scientific Affiliation (ASA, community of Christians who are scientists, engineers, and scholars in related fields). Also remains in a safe position of quantum uncertainty about how quantum physics should be interpreted.
• I once thought that the "Inspiring Philosophy" group with Johanan Raatz, were doing a better job. Somehow they do, but still they have a trouble : they cannot stop mixing the correct arguments with bullshit. I spent a lot of time trying to correct them in private conversations, they ultimately refused correction. I gave up. See here some beginnings of my tries.

Conclusion : trying to prove God's existence, or reading things from people (such as Christian apologists) motivated by any bias (such as trying to "save" people) only leads to logical fallacies, and illusions of having arguments when there isn't any genuine one ; thus flawed ways of thinking. Clear genuine understanding of things and why God exists, much better comes from pure science, such as physics.

• There is no need or value to believe in God, not even in preparation "for going to heaven", so why would He care ?
  
• If God had an opportunity to guide or inspire anyone, He would have much more urgent things than this to do with it than explain how to argue for His existence, but we can observe that even the more urgent things are not done, so that there is of course no chance for the less urgent ones to be done either.
• Thus, God does not guide anybody anyway, not even Christians apologists and those who like them, the least bit

• God hates the sane intelligent people and only loves idiots, so He finds it good to inspire His preachers to only propagate the flawed pseudo-arguments that He chose, to only convince idiots, as this is what God needs to better select His people as those stupid enough for His taste, to whom he likes to provide His grace and salvation ; people too intelligent for being fooled by these pseudo-arguments and who would need correct ones instead, would not be fit for heaven anyway, so, let them go to hell.
  

Criticism of particular arguments

See also

• A mind/mathematics dualistic foundation of physical reality (with comments at fqxi)
• Genesis of a Pythagorean Universe by Alexey and Lev Burov
• Towards a Grand Unified Theory of Mathematics and Physics by Peter Woit
• Map = Territory by Martin Seltmann

Is there any mathematical proof of God's existence ?

External links and references

Among the first found google results on the topic